LiveMarket prices
Wheat flour (packaged)58—Ginger (imported)167—Ginger (local)154—Aman rice (medium)56—Aman rice (coarse)48—Aman rice (fine)72—Iodised salt (packaged)32—Green chilli218—Broiler chicken162—Mutton900—Sugar (local)132—Chickpeas (whole)85—Farm eggs (red)47—Onion (local)60—Boro rice (medium)55—Boro rice (coarse)47—Boro rice (fine)66—Beef729—Mung dal122—Garlic (imported)192—Garlic (local)173—Soybean oil163—
Updated 22 October 2026
Dhaka26°Clear skyHumidity 73%Wind 8 km/h

Machine-learning tool scores the risk of losing livestock feed from field to bunk

The National Animal Nutrition Program's Feed Value Loss Risk Assessment Tool uses a random forest model to rate how harvesting, storage, mixing and feeding practices threaten feed quantity and quality, starting with silage.

Machine-learning tool scores the risk of losing livestock feed from field to bunk
Agrotech

The US National Animal Nutrition Program (NANP) is developing an artificial-intelligence tool to help livestock producers spot where they risk losing feed, and its nutritional value, between harvest and the feed bunk, Farms.com reports.

The Feed Value Loss Risk Assessment Tool is an interactive application that combines research, expert knowledge and machine learning. It looks at every stage of feed management: harvesting, storage, handling, mixing, delivery and feeding. The team includes Hector Menendez, assistant professor and SDSU Extension livestock grazing specialist, with Jordan M. Adams, Julia T. Silva, Karun Kaniyamattam and Luis O. Tedeschi.

The tool uses a random forest model, a machine-learning method that weighs several factors together to estimate the relative risk of feed value loss. Silage gets detailed attention first, and the tool is also designed for hay and grain. Producers enter their practices at each stage, receive an overall risk score, and can change conditions to see how different choices would alter the risk.

The score does not give the exact amount or percentage of feed lost; it shows relative risk, with a higher score meaning a greater chance of losing quantity or nutrients. The developers stress that it supports decisions but does not replace farm experience or professional advice, and producers can discuss results with NANP's Feed Management Committee, Extension staff, NRCS advisers or nutritionists.

Because feed is one of a livestock farm's largest costs, cutting avoidable losses protects both profit and the nutrients animals receive, the project says.

Photo: Rasbak / Wikimedia Commons (CC BY-SA 3.0)

Source: Farms.com

Farms.comSource

Agrotech

Related stories

Comments

(0)